PETALING JAYA: Certificate of Legal Practice (CLP) examination candidates are judged solely on their knowledge and merit and not on any quota system, the Legal Profession Qualifying Board (LPQB) said.Its CLP examinations director K. Muniandy said the paper setters and markers did not know the candidates’ names as only their index numbers appeared on the answer scripts.
“This negates any notion that there is a quota system practised by the LPQB. We reiterate that the system put in place does not allow for it at all,” he said. Results for the CLP exam in July were released yesterday.
Muniandy said there was a misconception for years that candidates were failed on purpose, that a racial quota existed to be met by the board and that the examination only tested candidates’ memory function.
“It is the candidates who resort to regurgitation of information memorised by them.”Muniandy stressed that the LPQB did not seek to fail any candidate and the answer scripts were marked purely on the candidate’s knowledge and merit.
“Candidates must be able to identify legal issues raised in the examination questions and advise on an appropriate legal recourse without going into an academic exercise or a discourse on the law.”
“My duty is also to ensure that the questions set are not susceptible to any form of leakage,” he said, adding that security and safekeeping of the questions were paramount from inception to after the exam.
According to Muniandy, the examination papers are seen only by himself, the paper setters, the typing clerk, translator, moderator and the printer.
“The number of personnel involved in the process is kept to a minimum.” “The prime concern of the office of the director of the CLP examination is the integrity of the examination,” he said.
The CLP exam papers are set by retired and serving judges of the superior courts, senior lawyers from the Malaysian Bar and officers from the Judicial and Legal Service.
“I can assure everyone that the questions set are not to trick candidates,” Muniandy said, adding that they were intended to be unambiguous, comprehensible and precise.
He said some candidates often diverted into giving answers which were totally unrelated to legal practice.
http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/bar_news/berita_badan_peguam/clp_exam_candidates_judged_on_their_knowledge_and_merit.html
__________________________________________________
COMMENT
BOON OF A BRIDGE, NOT BANE OF A WALL
Written by Stephen Tan Ban Cheng, Wednesday, September 24 2008 06:51 pm
My dear Mr Muniandy
One swallow,
my grandmother told me repeatedly before she died 45 years ago, does not a summer make. The history of the CLP has been a long one. It began, as I said in a previous posting, as a BRIDGE to HELP law graduates who were unable to do their professionals in the United Kingdom.
Over the years, before you took over as director, it became a WALL to HINDER the same group. For more years than I care to remember, the CLP has become a BANE for law graduates instead of the BOON that it was promised to be. It has been the subject of so many curses. Just look at the fate of your predecessor. Very sad.
For those who are visibly challenged, a BRIDGE is a HORIZONTAL construct while a WALL is a VERTICLE one.
Mr Muniandy, my prayer is that during your tenure, the Legal Profession Qualifying Board will keep faith with the law graduates it is charged to serve and will not be visited by the scandals that marred what would otherwise have remained a solid institution.
Stephen Tan Ban Cheng
No comments:
Post a Comment